Hard cheese, Biddy, but those crippling fees are for the good of the consumer…

The regulation of cheese-making in the name of food safety and the hounding of a cheese-maker has prompted economist Eric Crampton to chide the Government for failing to curb Nanny Statism.

Crampton, Head of Research with The New Zealand Initiative in Wellington, says the Government is continuing its crusade against an elderly woman whose four cows produce the milk for her small-scale raw milk cheeses.

In this week’s Insights newsletter he writes:

Thomas Hobbes told us the State is necessary to protect us. The war of all against all that would ensue without a State to protect us from each other would be worse than even a terrible despot.

New Zealand’s Hobbeseans can this week thank the State for protecting us from artisanal cheese.

Crampton is referring to Eketahuna cheese-maker Biddy Fraser-Davies’ ongoing fight with the Ministry for Primary Industry.

According to a recent Radio New Zealand report, at least half of the $40,000 her four cows’ cheese earned went to cover the State’s regulatory fees last year.

She says, “It works out that the raw cheese testing cost for me is $260 per kilo, which doesn’t include the ancillary costs of actually making the cheese.”

Crampton said he is  surprised the ministry still hounds Biddy. He says the 2014 Food Act was supposed to scale regulatory burdens to the risk imposed, but that doesn’t seem to have affected cheeses under the Animal Products Act.

Biddy is obliged to submit samples for expensive testing from ten consecutive tiny batches. She has four cows.

Crampton comments:

There’s an old joke about farming under different political systems. Under communism, you have two cows that you have to take care of, and the government takes all of the milk. Meanwhile, under capitalism, if you have two cows, you sell one to buy a bull.

Well, artificial insemination means you don’t really need the bull any more. But it looks like under New Zealand Nanny Statism, if you have four cows, you have to milk two of them to cover the regulatory compliance costs for the other two. And that’s its own load of bull.

Worse, New Zealand raw milk cheeses are reported to be held to a higher standard than European ones sold in New Zealand.

But just think how much worse it would be without the State to protect us here. Under the terrible, terrible ravages of voluntary interaction, makers of very safe large-batch cheeses would be able to put certification stickers on their cheeses advertising that fact. Makers of small batch cheeses could put labels on theirs saying that small-scale artisanal products are riskier than big commercial products, but sure are tasty. And consumers could weigh up the risks and make their choices.

Crampton wonders if Hobbes adequately considered the tyranny of those who would protect and torment us for our own good.

He reminds his readers that the 2009 regulations on raw-milk cheeses came in under National, yet National’s 2008 election campaign was all about doing away with the Helengrad Nanny State.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s